Lawsuit Claims Alison Brie And Dave Franco's "Together" Is A Blatant Copyright Violation

David

3 min read

Post on May 20, 2025

4.4

Share

Lawsuit Claims Alison Brie and Dave Franco's "Together" is a Blatant Copyright Violation

A bombshell lawsuit alleges that the critically acclaimed film Together, starring real-life couple Alison Brie and Dave Franco, is a direct copyright infringement of an independent filmmaker's work. The legal battle promises to be a fascinating case study in the murky waters of artistic inspiration versus outright copying.

The lawsuit, filed in the Central District of California on behalf of independent filmmaker [Filmmaker's Name], claims that Together, directed by Nick Robinson, bears striking similarities to [Filmmaker's Name]'s unreleased screenplay, "[Screenplay Title]". The complaint details numerous alleged similarities, ranging from plot points and character arcs to specific dialogue and scene structures. [Filmmaker's Name] alleges that they shared their screenplay with a mutual acquaintance who later worked on Together, thus establishing a plausible route for access to the protected material.

Key Allegations of Copyright Infringement:

The lawsuit highlights several key areas of alleged similarity, claiming that Together directly appropriated:

• Central Premise: Both works reportedly center on a couple navigating a period of self-isolation, grappling with similar relationship challenges and external pressures.
• Character Development: Specific character traits, motivations, and relationships are allegedly mirrored between the two works. The lawsuit points to strikingly similar character arcs for both the male and female leads.
• Dialogue and Scene Structure: Several lines of dialogue and specific scene setups are claimed to be virtually identical, raising concerns about substantial similarity.
• Thematic Elements: Both works reportedly explore similar thematic elements surrounding communication, conflict resolution, and the impact of confinement on relationships.

The Potential Impact on the Film Industry:

This lawsuit has significant implications for the film industry. It underscores the importance of protecting intellectual property and highlights the potential legal ramifications of unauthorized use of copyrighted material, even in subtly disguised forms. The outcome could influence future filmmaking practices and potentially lead to stricter scrutiny of screenplays and their development processes. Furthermore, the case may prompt a broader discussion about the line between inspiration and infringement in creative works.

What Happens Next?

The legal battle is expected to be lengthy and complex. Both sides will likely present expert testimony on the issue of substantial similarity, and the court will need to determine whether the similarities between the two works constitute copyright infringement. This includes analyzing the "transformative use" argument, which holds that even if similarities exist, the new work is sufficiently different to escape copyright infringement.

The Future of Together:

The lawsuit’s outcome could significantly impact the future of Together. While the film has received critical acclaim, a successful copyright infringement lawsuit could result in significant financial penalties for the production company and distribution rights being withdrawn.

Conclusion:

This case serves as a powerful reminder of the legal complexities surrounding copyright in the entertainment industry. It will be closely watched by filmmakers, studios, and legal professionals alike, as it potentially sets a precedent for future cases involving allegations of copyright infringement in film. We will continue to update this article as the legal proceedings unfold. Stay tuned for further developments.