Transit Union To Sue Curtis Sliwa Over Allegedly Defamatory Comments

David

3 min read

Post on Jul 29, 2025

4.7

Share

Transit Union to Sue Curtis Sliwa Over Allegedly Defamatory Comments

Transit Workers Union Declares Legal Action Against Controversial Figure

New York, NY – The Transport Workers Union (TWU) Local 100 announced today it will file a lawsuit against Curtis Sliwa, the controversial head of the Guardian Angels and a prominent media personality, for allegedly making defamatory statements against the union and its members. The lawsuit, expected to be filed within the week, claims Sliwa’s recent public comments falsely portrayed the TWU as corrupt and irresponsible, damaging the union's reputation and the livelihoods of its members.

This legal action marks a significant escalation in the ongoing tension between Sliwa and the TWU, a powerful union representing thousands of transit workers in New York City. The dispute stems from Sliwa's repeated criticisms of the TWU's contract negotiations and its handling of various transit-related issues. These criticisms, the union alleges, have crossed the line from legitimate commentary into actionable defamation.

Sliwa's Allegedly Defamatory Statements

The lawsuit will specifically target several public statements made by Sliwa in recent weeks, including [insert specific examples of Sliwa's statements here, citing specific media outlets or platforms]. The TWU argues that these statements are not only false but also deliberately intended to harm the union's image and undermine its credibility with the public. They contend that Sliwa’s inflammatory rhetoric has incited unnecessary hostility towards transit workers and created an unfair and damaging narrative.

"Mr. Sliwa's reckless accusations have gone too far," said John Samuelsen, President of TWU Local 100. "His words have directly harmed the reputation of our hardworking members and undermined the vital services they provide to this city. We will not stand idly by while he spreads lies and misinformation."

The union's legal team is confident they have a strong case, citing the potential for significant damages due to the widespread reach of Sliwa's public pronouncements. They will be seeking both compensatory and punitive damages to compensate for the harm caused to the TWU and its members.

Defamation Law and Public Figures

The case raises important questions about the intersection of free speech and defamation law, particularly concerning public figures. While public figures have a higher burden of proof in defamation cases, the TWU believes Sliwa's statements were not protected opinion but rather demonstrably false and malicious assertions. The legal battle promises to be a closely watched case with implications for the future of public discourse and the rights of labor unions.

This legal challenge comes at a time of increased scrutiny of public figures and their responsibility for the language they use in the public sphere. The outcome could have a significant impact on the way future public discourse is regulated.

What Happens Next?

The TWU is preparing a comprehensive legal strategy, gathering evidence and consulting with its legal team to ensure a robust defense of its members' reputations. The lawsuit’s filing is anticipated shortly, and the legal proceedings are expected to unfold over several months, potentially even years. The case will undoubtedly be closely followed by media outlets and labor organizations across the nation.

Call to Action: Stay informed about this developing legal battle by following our website and social media channels for updates. We will continue to provide comprehensive coverage as the story unfolds. [Link to TWU website] [Link to TWU social media]