Swiss Watchmaker Apologizes Following 'Slanted Eye' Ad Controversy

David

3 min read

Post on Aug 20, 2025

4.2

Share

Swiss Watchmaker Apologizes Following 'Slanted Eye' Ad Controversy

A leading Swiss watchmaker is facing intense backlash and calls for boycotts after a recent advertising campaign featuring a model with exaggerated eye features deemed offensive by many as perpetuating harmful stereotypes. The advertisement, which showcased the brand's new collection, sparked outrage across social media platforms, prompting a swift and formal apology from the company. This incident highlights the growing importance of cultural sensitivity in global marketing and the potentially devastating consequences of overlooking diverse perspectives.

The Controversial Advertisement and Public Outcry

The advertisement, released last week across various digital channels, depicted a model with eyes visibly slanted upwards, a feature often associated with harmful caricatures of East Asian individuals. The image immediately drew criticism from numerous online communities, with many accusing the watchmaker of promoting racist stereotypes. Hashtags like #RacistWatchAd and #Boycott[BrandName] quickly trended, garnering widespread attention and exposing the brand to significant reputational damage. The controversy also extended beyond social media, with articles appearing in major news outlets worldwide, further amplifying the negative publicity.

The Watchmaker's Response and Apology

In response to the mounting criticism, [BrandName], the Swiss watchmaker, issued a public apology through their official website and social media channels. The statement expressed regret for the unintentional offense caused and emphasized the company's commitment to diversity and inclusion. They stated that the image was not intended to be offensive and that they had removed the advertisement from all platforms. However, the apology hasn't entirely quelled the public anger, with many demanding more concrete actions to prevent similar incidents in the future. The statement reads in part: "We deeply regret the offense caused by our recent advertisement. It was never our intention to perpetuate harmful stereotypes, and we sincerely apologize to those who were hurt by the image. We are committed to reviewing our internal processes to ensure such mistakes are avoided in the future."

Beyond the Apology: A Call for Systemic Change

While the apology is a necessary first step, many critics argue that it's not enough. They call for a deeper examination of the company's internal practices and a more robust commitment to diversity and inclusion at all levels, from creative development to executive decision-making. This includes implementing diversity training for marketing and advertising teams, ensuring representation from diverse cultural backgrounds in future campaigns, and establishing clear guidelines to prevent similar incidents from recurring. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the need for brands to prioritize cultural sensitivity in their marketing strategies.

• Key Takeaways: This situation underscores the critical need for:
  • Thorough cultural sensitivity training for marketing and advertising teams.
  • Diverse representation in all aspects of brand development and advertising.
  • Robust review processes for all marketing materials to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes.
  • A genuine commitment to inclusivity beyond simple apologies.

This event serves as a cautionary tale for other companies, emphasizing the importance of proactive measures to avoid similar controversies. Failing to address issues of representation and cultural sensitivity can lead to irreparable damage to a brand's reputation and ultimately, its bottom line. Learn more about [link to relevant article on cultural sensitivity in marketing].

What are your thoughts on this controversy? Share your opinion in the comments below.