Sankey Regrets Timing Of 5+11 CFP Model Discussion With SEC

David

3 min read

Post on May 30, 2025

4.3

Share

Sankey Regrets Timing of 5+11 CFP Model Discussion with SEC: College Football's Expansion Debate Deepens

The ongoing saga surrounding college football's expansion continues to generate headlines, with the latest development focusing on the timing of discussions between SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey and the NCAA regarding the proposed 5+11 College Football Playoff (CFP) model. Sankey has openly expressed regret over the timing of those conversations, adding another layer of complexity to an already contentious debate.

The proposed 5+11 model, which would feature five power conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, SEC) receiving automatic bids to the CFP, alongside six at-large selections, has faced significant backlash from smaller conferences. Critics argue the model exacerbates the existing power imbalance within college football, potentially diminishing opportunities for non-power conference teams to compete for a national championship.

Sankey's Admission Fuels the Fire

Sankey's admission of regret centers on the perceived lack of transparency and the timing of discussions with the NCAA, specifically before a formal proposal had been presented to the CFP management committee. This has led to accusations of backroom dealings and a lack of inclusivity in the decision-making process.

“In hindsight, the timing of those conversations wasn't ideal,” Sankey stated in a recent press conference. He emphasized the importance of collaboration and broad consensus moving forward, aiming to alleviate concerns and foster a more collaborative approach to future CFP expansion discussions. However, the damage may already be done.

The Heart of the Controversy: Power vs. Parity

The core issue at the heart of this debate remains the balance between power and parity in college football. The 5+11 model, while potentially financially beneficial for the power conferences, is seen by many as a direct threat to the competitive landscape. The potential for smaller conferences to be systematically excluded from the CFP raises concerns about the very principles of fairness and opportunity within the sport.

This isn't simply a matter of sporting fairness; it's a debate with significant financial implications. The CFP generates substantial revenue, and the distribution of that revenue is a crucial aspect of the ongoing negotiations. The proposed 5+11 model, with its inherent bias towards the power conferences, raises questions about equitable revenue sharing and the long-term financial health of the entire collegiate athletic system.

Looking Ahead: What's Next for CFP Expansion?

The future of CFP expansion remains uncertain. While Sankey's admission of regret might seem like a step in the right direction, the damage to trust and the widespread opposition to the 5+11 model pose significant challenges. Many stakeholders, including representatives from smaller conferences, are calling for a more inclusive and transparent process moving forward. The upcoming meetings of the CFP management committee will be crucial in determining the next steps and potentially shaping the future of college football's postseason landscape. The debate promises to be long and contentious, with significant implications for the sport's future.

Keywords: Sankey, SEC, CFP, College Football Playoff, 5+11 model, college football expansion, NCAA, power conferences, revenue sharing, college football, sports news

Call to Action (subtle): Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story as we continue to follow the evolving situation surrounding College Football Playoff expansion.