Sankey Discusses 5+11 CFP Model With SEC Coaches Amidst Timing Concerns

David

3 min read

Post on May 30, 2025

4.1

Share

Sankey Discusses 5+11 CFP Model with SEC Coaches Amidst Growing Timing Concerns

The College Football Playoff (CFP) expansion to a 12-team format is inching closer to reality, but questions remain about its implementation. Specifically, concerns are swirling around the timing of the expanded playoff, with some believing the current timeline is too rushed. This uncertainty was a key topic of discussion when SEC commissioner Greg Sankey recently met with SEC head coaches.

Sankey's meetings with the SEC coaching ranks focused heavily on the proposed 5+11 model, the most likely structure for the expanded CFP. This model features the six highest-ranked conference champions automatically qualifying, along with six at-large bids selected by a selection committee. This structure, while aiming to balance tradition with broader inclusion, is facing significant pushback due to the compressed timeframe for implementation.

The 5+11 Model: A Closer Look

The 5+11 model intends to address the criticisms leveled at the previous four-team playoff. Critics argued the previous system unfairly excluded deserving teams from Power Five conferences and severely limited representation from Group of Five conferences. The inclusion of automatic bids for conference champions aims to address these concerns, theoretically rewarding consistent conference dominance. However, the at-large bids still hold significant influence, potentially leaving room for controversy and debate.

Timing Concerns Dominate the Conversation

The primary point of contention during Sankey's meetings was the projected timeline. While the NCAA Board of Governors approved the 12-team playoff expansion, the precise implementation date remains fluid. Concerns arise from the need for significant logistical adjustments, including scheduling conflicts and the potential impact on the regular season. Coaches voiced worries about the increased pressure on players and the potential for injuries with a more demanding schedule.

• Scheduling Conflicts: The addition of more playoff games necessitates shifting the existing bowl game structure and potentially impacting the regular season schedule. Finding dates that accommodate all stakeholders presents a major challenge.
• Player Welfare: A longer season puts added strain on players, raising concerns about player burnout and the potential for a higher number of injuries. The balance between competitive ambition and player health is a delicate one.
• Revenue Distribution: The expanded playoff will undoubtedly impact revenue distribution among member schools, leading to potential disputes and negotiations. This aspect remains a major point of discussion in ongoing negotiations.

Navigating the Challenges Ahead

Sankey acknowledged the challenges presented by the short timeframe, emphasizing the importance of collaboration and open communication between the CFP management committee and the member conferences. He stressed the need for a thorough and comprehensive plan to address the logistical and practical challenges associated with the transition. The success of the expanded playoff hinges on effectively managing these concerns.

The meetings highlight the complexities involved in transitioning to a 12-team playoff. While the expansion promises a more inclusive and exciting postseason, the success of the new model depends on carefully addressing the timing and logistical concerns raised by coaches and stakeholders across the country. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether the ambitious timeline for the 12-team playoff can be successfully navigated. Further updates and discussions are expected in the coming weeks. Stay tuned for further developments on this crucial issue shaping the future of college football.