Greg Sankey Regrets Timing Of 5+11 CFP Model Discussion With SEC Coaches

David

3 min read

Post on May 29, 2025

4.3

Share

Greg Sankey Regrets Timing of 5+11 CFP Model Discussion with SEC Coaches

SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey acknowledges misstep in discussing the controversial 5+11 College Football Playoff expansion model with conference coaches before the public.

The dust has barely settled on the dramatic College Football Playoff (CFP) expansion debate, and already controversy is brewing. SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey has publicly expressed regret over the timing of his discussions regarding the proposed 5+11 model with Southeastern Conference coaches. This revelation adds another layer to the already complex and contentious narrative surrounding the future of college football's postseason.

The 5+11 model, which would have granted automatic bids to the six highest-ranked conference champions, plus five at-large selections, was ultimately rejected in favor of a 12-team format. While the 12-team model is now set to debut in 2024, Sankey's admission highlights a potential communication breakdown within the SEC and raises questions about transparency in the decision-making process.

Transparency Concerns Emerge After Private Discussions

Sankey's comments, made during a recent interview, revealed that he engaged in discussions about the 5+11 model with SEC coaches before the details were shared publicly. This preemptive briefing, he now admits, was a mistake. “In retrospect, the timing of those conversations wasn't ideal,” Sankey stated. "It created the perception, and perhaps the reality, of a lack of transparency.”

This admission fuels criticism from those who argue that the process lacked inclusivity and sufficient public discourse. The private conversations, critics argue, may have influenced SEC coaches' opinions before they had the opportunity to consider the broader implications of the proposal within the context of the national college football landscape. The lack of a more open and public discussion allowed speculation and potential misinterpretations to flourish.

Impact on Future CFP Discussions

Sankey's acknowledgement of his error has significant implications for future CFP discussions and broader college football governance. It underscores the need for greater transparency and inclusivity in the decision-making processes that shape the sport. The incident serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the importance of open communication and avoiding the appearance of favoritism or backroom dealings.

The incident also raises questions about the role of conference commissioners in shaping the future of the CFP. While commissioners play a crucial role in advocating for their respective conferences, maintaining public trust requires careful consideration of how information is disseminated and debated. The SEC, a powerhouse in college football, faces the challenge of regaining public confidence in its leadership after this perceived misstep.

Moving Forward: A Call for Greater Transparency

The move to a 12-team playoff marks a significant shift in college football, but the controversies surrounding the expansion process highlight the need for greater transparency and accountability. Sankey's regret, while a step in the right direction, underscores the ongoing need for improved communication and collaboration among all stakeholders—coaches, commissioners, athletes, and fans—to ensure a fair and equitable future for the sport. The lessons learned from this episode should inform future decision-making processes to prevent similar situations from arising. The future of college football depends on it.

Keywords: Greg Sankey, SEC, College Football Playoff, CFP Expansion, 5+11 Model, 12-Team Playoff, Transparency, College Football, Controversy, NCAA

Related Articles: (Links to relevant articles on CFP expansion and SEC news could be added here)