Green Bay's Revised Tush Push Rule: What Changed In The Resubmission?

David

3 min read

Post on May 22, 2025

4.7

Share

Green Bay's Revised Tush Push Rule: What Changed in the Resubmission?

Green Bay's controversial "Tush Push" ordinance, initially met with widespread ridicule and public outcry, has been resubmitted to the city council with significant revisions. The initial proposal, which aimed to regulate “inappropriate” displays of buttocks in public, sparked a firestorm of debate, attracting national media attention and prompting accusations of being overly vague and potentially discriminatory. This revised version attempts to address these concerns, but does it go far enough?

The original ordinance, widely mocked online and criticized for its lack of clear definition, faced immediate backlash. Many argued it was too broad, potentially criminalizing innocent behavior, and lacked sufficient due process protections. The resubmission aims to rectify these shortcomings. But what specifically has changed?

Key Revisions in the Resubmitted Ordinance:

• Clearer Definition of "Inappropriate Display": The most significant change is a more precise definition of what constitutes an "inappropriate display" of buttocks. The revised ordinance includes specific examples, such as intentional exposure for the purpose of causing offense or alarm, while explicitly excluding accidental or unintentional exposures. This attempts to address concerns about the original version's ambiguity and potential for misuse.

• Enhanced Due Process Protections: The resubmission incorporates stronger due process safeguards. It clarifies the procedures for issuing citations and provides greater opportunities for appeal. This move aims to mitigate the risk of unfair or arbitrary enforcement.

• Focus on Public Nuisance: The revised ordinance shifts its focus from simply regulating the display of buttocks to addressing the broader issue of public nuisance. This broader framing allows for a more consistent application of the law, targeting behaviors that disrupt public order regardless of the specific body part involved. This helps to avoid singling out a particular body part for regulation.

• Community Input & Consultation: The city council claims to have incorporated significant feedback from community members and legal experts during the revision process. While the specifics of this consultation remain unclear, this acknowledgement suggests an attempt to make the ordinance more representative of the community's values.

Remaining Concerns and Future Outlook:

Despite the revisions, some concerns remain. Critics argue that even the revised definition is still too subjective and leaves room for arbitrary enforcement. The potential for discriminatory application based on factors such as gender and body type remains a point of contention. The effectiveness of the revised ordinance will depend heavily on how it is implemented and enforced by law enforcement.

The resubmission of the ordinance is expected to generate further debate and public discussion. The city council will likely hold public hearings before a final vote. The outcome will serve as a case study on the challenges of balancing public order with individual liberties and freedom of expression. Following the public hearings, the council will vote on the revised ordinance. The future of the “Tush Push” rule in Green Bay hangs in the balance.

Further Reading:

• [Link to City Council Website – relevant ordinance page] (Replace with actual link)
• [Link to a news article on the original proposal] (Replace with actual link)
• [Link to an article discussing legal precedents on public indecency] (Replace with actual link)

Call to Action: Stay informed about the ongoing discussion and upcoming public hearings regarding this revised ordinance. Your participation in the democratic process is crucial.