Exploring The Flaws In Ari Aster's Ambitious "Eddington"

David

3 min read

Post on Jul 21, 2025

4.8

Share

Exploring the Flaws in Ari Aster's Ambitious "Midsommar" (Corrected Title)

Ari Aster's follow-up to the critically acclaimed Hereditary, Midsommar (not "Eddington"), promised a descent into unsettling folk horror, and delivered… something. While visually stunning and undeniably ambitious, the film's reception was more divisive than its predecessor. This article delves into the aspects of Midsommar that, despite its artistic merit, ultimately fell short for many viewers.

<h3>A Sun-Drenched Descent into Madness: The Visuals vs. the Narrative</h3>

Midsommar's cinematography is breathtaking. The vibrant hues of the Swedish Midsummer celebration initially create a sense of idyllic beauty, a stark contrast to the creeping dread that gradually unfolds. The long, unbroken takes and meticulous attention to detail contribute to the film's unsettling atmosphere. However, the visual splendor sometimes overshadows the narrative's coherence. While the imagery is potent, the plot, at times, feels disjointed and meandering. This disconnect between stunning visuals and a less-than-satisfying storyline leaves some viewers feeling aesthetically pleased but narratively unsatisfied.

<h3>Character Development: More Than Just Grief</h3>

Dani (Florence Pugh), the film's protagonist, experiences a devastating loss early on. Her grief fuels much of the narrative, but some argue that her character arc lacks depth. While Pugh delivers a compelling performance, the film’s exploration of grief often feels superficial, relying more on visual cues of distress than a nuanced portrayal of emotional trauma. The supporting characters, too, feel underdeveloped, serving primarily as functional pieces within the larger narrative puzzle rather than fully realized individuals. This lack of character depth limits the emotional impact, especially considering the film's ambitious themes.

<h3>Folk Horror Tropes and Their Limitations</h3>

Midsommar draws heavily on folk horror tropes, incorporating elements of pagan ritual and unsettling rural settings. While the film effectively utilizes these tropes to create a sense of unease, its reliance on familiar conventions prevents it from forging truly unique ground. Some viewers found the film's depiction of pagan rituals predictable, lacking the originality and subversive twist that elevated other films within the genre. The predictable nature of the horror elements, despite their effective visual execution, ultimately detracts from the overall experience.

<h3>The Ambiguity of Meaning: A Double-Edged Sword</h3>

Ari Aster is known for his ambiguous storytelling, and Midsommar is no exception. While some appreciate the film's open-endedness, allowing for multiple interpretations, others find it frustratingly vague. The film's lack of clear answers regarding the nature of the cult and the meaning behind Dani's experiences leaves some feeling unfulfilled. This ambiguity, while potentially adding layers of depth for some, can also lead to a sense of narrative incompleteness for others.

<h3>Conclusion: A Visually Stunning but Flawed Experience</h3>

Midsommar is a visually arresting and ambitious film that tackles complex themes of grief, trauma, and the unsettling nature of human relationships. However, its flaws – primarily in character development, narrative coherence, and reliance on familiar horror tropes – prevent it from reaching the heights of its predecessor. While it remains a visually striking and thought-provoking piece of filmmaking, its shortcomings highlight the challenges of balancing artistic ambition with compelling storytelling. What are your thoughts on Midsommar? Share your opinions in the comments below!