Dissecting The Narrative Issues In Ari Aster's "Eddington"

David

3 min read

Post on Jul 20, 2025

4.0

Share

Dissecting the Narrative Issues in Ari Aster's "Midsommar" (Corrected Title)

Ari Aster's films are not for the faint of heart. Known for his unsettling visuals and deeply unsettling psychological horror, Aster's latest film, Midsommar (not "Eddington"), has sparked considerable debate amongst critics and audiences alike. While lauded for its stunning cinematography and unsettling atmosphere, the film's narrative has faced significant scrutiny. This article delves into the key narrative issues present in Midsommar, exploring its strengths and weaknesses in crafting a compelling and cohesive story.

A Slow Burn That Doesn't Always Ignite:

Midsommar unfolds at a glacial pace, a deliberate choice by Aster to build tension and immerse the viewer in the unsettling atmosphere of the Harga commune. However, this slow burn approach, while effective in creating a sense of dread, also leaves some viewers feeling frustrated. The pacing, coupled with a relatively simple plot, can feel languid at times, leading to a sense of narrative stagnation. The film’s runtime, therefore, becomes a crucial factor in determining whether the experience is rewarding or tedious.

Character Development: More Than Just Dani's Trauma:

While Florence Pugh delivers a captivating performance as Dani, the grieving protagonist, the supporting characters often feel underdeveloped. Their motivations remain somewhat opaque, hindering the audience's ability to fully invest in their fates. While this ambiguity might be intentional, aiming to mirror the unsettling strangeness of the Harga cult, it ultimately diminishes the emotional impact of the film's climax. A stronger focus on the supporting cast could have significantly enhanced the narrative’s overall effectiveness.

Symbolism and Subtext: A Double-Edged Sword:

Aster’s films are rich in symbolism and subtext. Midsommar is no exception, employing vivid imagery and unsettling rituals to explore themes of grief, betrayal, and the complexities of human relationships. However, the film’s reliance on visual storytelling, while visually striking, occasionally leaves the narrative feeling cryptic and ambiguous. While open to interpretation can be a strength, in this instance, it occasionally veers into the realm of vagueness, leaving some viewers feeling lost and unsatisfied.

The Cult's Credibility: A Question of Belief:

The Harga commune, with its bizarre traditions and unsettling practices, is a central element of Midsommar. However, the film struggles to fully establish the cult's internal logic and motivations. The lack of clear explanations for certain events can make it challenging for the audience to fully accept the reality presented on screen. This lack of grounding can detract from the overall immersion and believability of the narrative.

The Power of the Ending:

Despite these narrative issues, the ending of Midsommar remains a point of considerable discussion and analysis. It’s a powerful, albeit ambiguous conclusion, leaving the audience to ponder the implications of Dani's transformation. This ambiguity, unlike the vagueness discussed earlier, is arguably a strength, encouraging viewers to re-evaluate the film's events and themes.

Conclusion: A Visually Stunning, but Narratively Flawed Experience?

Midsommar is undoubtedly a visually stunning and atmospherically disturbing film. However, its narrative shortcomings, particularly regarding pacing, character development, and the believability of the cult, prevent it from reaching its full potential. While the film's symbolism and ambiguous ending provoke discussion and contemplation, it's crucial to acknowledge the flaws present within its storytelling structure. Ultimately, Midsommar's success hinges on individual viewer preferences, particularly regarding the balance between atmospheric horror and cohesive narrative. What are your thoughts on the film's narrative? Share your opinions in the comments below!