Copyright Lawsuit Claims Alison Brie And Dave Franco's "Together" Is A Rip-off

David

3 min read

Post on May 19, 2025

4.2

Share

Copyright Lawsuit Claims Alison Brie and Dave Franco's "Together" is a Rip-Off

A surprising legal battle has erupted, alleging that Alison Brie and Dave Franco's acclaimed film, "Together," is a blatant copyright infringement. The lawsuit, filed earlier this week, claims striking similarities between the film's plot and characters and an independent filmmaker's previously unreleased screenplay. This development throws a shadow over the critically praised romantic drama and raises questions about the intricacies of copyright law in the film industry.

The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, names several production companies involved in "Together" as defendants alongside Brie and Franco. The plaintiff, an independent filmmaker named [Plaintiff's Name], claims their screenplay, "[Screenplay Title]", bears a substantial resemblance to "Together" in terms of plot structure, character development, and even specific dialogue. Key similarities cited in the complaint include [briefly mention 2-3 specific, non-spoilery similarities, e.g., "the central conflict of a relationship strained by lockdown," "the characters' shared artistic professions," "a specific humorous scene involving a pet"].

This isn't the first time a high-profile film has faced accusations of copyright infringement. Similar lawsuits have targeted major studios in the past, often resulting in lengthy and expensive legal battles. Remembering the infamous case of [mention a relevant past case, e.g., The Shawshank Redemption similarities debate], the current situation highlights the ongoing challenges faced by both independent creators and established production houses in protecting intellectual property.

Understanding Copyright Law in Film

Copyright law protects original works of authorship, including screenplays. However, proving infringement requires demonstrating both access to the original work and substantial similarity. The plaintiff needs to show that the defendants had access to their screenplay – perhaps through a submission to a film festival or a shared agent – and that "Together" incorporates enough protectable elements from the screenplay to constitute infringement. This is a high bar to clear, and the courts will carefully analyze the similarities to determine if they amount to unlawful copying rather than coincidental similarities or the use of common tropes within a genre.

The Impact on "Together's" Legacy

The lawsuit casts a long shadow over the positive reception "Together" received. The film, lauded for its [mention positive critical reception aspects, e.g., "intimate portrayal of a relationship under pressure," "realistic depiction of lockdown life," "strong performances from the lead actors"], now faces the possibility of significant legal ramifications. The outcome could impact future distribution and potentially even lead to financial settlements or even the removal of the film from streaming services.

What Happens Next?

The legal process will likely be lengthy and complex. Expect a period of discovery, where both sides exchange evidence and information. The court will ultimately need to determine whether the similarities between the plaintiff's screenplay and "Together" constitute copyright infringement. This will involve careful examination of the creative elements of both works and an analysis of legal precedent.

While the outcome remains uncertain, this lawsuit serves as a stark reminder of the importance of protecting intellectual property. For aspiring filmmakers, it underscores the need for robust legal protection and documentation of their creative work. The case also highlights the ongoing challenges in navigating the complex world of copyright in the competitive film industry.

Do you think this lawsuit has merit? Share your thoughts in the comments below.