Copyright Battle: Alison Brie And Dave Franco Accused Of "Blatant Rip-Off" In "Together"

David

3 min read

Post on May 19, 2025

4.4

Share

Copyright Battle: Alison Brie and Dave Franco Accused of "Blatant Rip-Off" in "Together"

The charming indie film Together, starring real-life couple Alison Brie and Dave Franco, has found itself embroiled in a contentious copyright dispute. Accusations of a "blatant rip-off" have been levied against the actors and the film's production team, raising questions about originality and fair use in the creative industry. The controversy centers around striking similarities between Together's plot and a lesser-known screenplay, sparking a heated debate about intellectual property rights.

Striking Similarities Ignite the Dispute

The core of the dispute lies in the alleged similarities between Together's narrative and an unpublished screenplay titled Lockdown, written by independent screenwriter, Michael Stone. Stone claims that Together's plot, character arcs, and even specific dialogue bear a striking resemblance to his original work. He alleges that the film’s portrayal of a couple navigating a relationship during lockdown mirrors key elements of his screenplay, which he registered with the Writers Guild of America several years prior to Together's release.

Stone's legal team has highlighted several specific points of contention, including the depiction of a strained relationship tested by confinement, the inclusion of a pivotal argument involving a spilled glass of wine, and even the similar use of a specific piece of background music. These similarities, according to Stone, are too significant to be dismissed as mere coincidence. He insists that Together is not merely inspired by the concept of couples in lockdown but is a direct derivative of his original work.

The Actors and Production Company Respond

Neither Brie, Franco, nor the production company behind Together have yet issued a formal public statement directly addressing Stone's allegations. However, sources close to the production suggest that they intend to vigorously defend the film against the copyright infringement claim. Legal experts anticipate a protracted legal battle, potentially involving a detailed comparison of both works and an examination of the creative process behind Together.

The legal team representing the film will likely argue that the similarities are either coincidental or constitute fair use, a legal doctrine that allows for limited use of copyrighted material without permission under certain circumstances. However, proving fair use can be challenging, especially when dealing with significant plot similarities.

What Happens Next?

The outcome of this copyright battle will depend on the court's interpretation of the evidence presented by both sides. This case highlights the ongoing challenges faced by creators in protecting their intellectual property, especially in an increasingly interconnected and easily accessible digital landscape. The case could set a precedent for future disputes involving independent films and the potential for copyright infringement claims.

This situation also underscores the importance of proper copyright registration and protection for aspiring screenwriters. Registering a screenplay with organizations like the WGA provides crucial documentation that can be vital in legal disputes.

The Broader Implications

Beyond the immediate legal ramifications for Brie, Franco, and the production company, this case raises broader questions about originality and inspiration in filmmaking. Where is the line drawn between borrowing ideas and outright plagiarism? How can the rights of independent creators be effectively protected against potential infringement by larger productions? These are critical questions that will continue to be debated within the creative community. The outcome of this legal battle could significantly impact future independent filmmaking practices and copyright enforcement. We will continue to update this story as it unfolds.